ELT Conference Logos: The Good, the Bad, and the Downright Ugly

Mike says: It all started when I shared a link to the KOTESOL RPSIG August 22nd Day of Reflection on a social network that allows more than 140 characters. My friend and fellow ELT professional commented Steve King on the logo for the 2015 KOTESOL International Conference (which can be seen below) shared along with the link, remarking, “Man that diagram… I’ve seen a dozen like it, a thousand. What is it with ELT conferences and wacky geometrical diagram concept logos?” He then went on to share some other images from various ELT conferences and I suggested a collection of these would be an interesting blog post. To my delight he graciously accepted the offer and wrote the entertaining piece that follows. Please feel free to share your thoughts or other memorable images in the comments. I will turn it over to Steve.

 

I’ve been working in ELT for quite some time, as a teacher, teacher trainer, and in publishing both as a researcher and as a business representative. That means I’ve been to quite a few conferences. TEFL this, TESOL that. Association of this or that. Here and there.

And it’s alright. I get to travel to a bunch of places, meet new people, meet up with old friends and colleagues, see some interesting talks, and have some meaningful interaction with people connected to a given project I might be working on. I quite like conferences. I’ve been to some tiny ones, such as Panama TESOL in 2013, which must have had all of 70 people, and to some huge ones such as the big TESOL International Events in Toronto, Dallas, and Philadelphia.

There’s one thing though that amuses, bewilders and bothers me. I’ve started even to look forward to seeing what spurious nonsense they’re going to come up with next. The next meaningless banality to wrap around what is plainly no more than a gathering of people who happen to work in the same industry.

I’m talking of course about the logo. You’ll find these on the conference program, on the lanyard you wear around your neck, on a banner above the stage in the plenary room, on posters throughout the conference site. On its website, its social media presence, on its call for proposals and on its conference proceedings book.

I’ll be blunt. More often than not, these are utterly meaningless, comically designed and, on occasion, almost unforgivably pretentious. There are two principally criminal elements to them:

The graphic: You might have a silhouette of the host city’s skyline at best, or, at worst, some contorted geometrical ‘concept’ design that’s somehow supposed to make you think, nay, to reflect on why we’re all here, in this city for the weekend. You get some amusingly trippy colors on these at times too. Bold reds. Pinks. Greens. YELLOW!

The slogan: These buzzword heavy word salads are rinsed, re-used, and repeated ad nauseum. The same freaking words over and over again. Community. Identity. Empowerment. Innovation. Challenges. Solutions. Transforming. I think maybe that there is an Online Conference Theme Buzzword Generator out there somewhere that organizers have been using. Or I would believe that, only there’s the fact that these words have been used continuously since before the internet was invented.

They’re not all bad. Researching this piece after a brief conversation with Mike Griffin, I actually found some I like. So let’s delve in. Here’s The Good, the Bad and the Downright Ugly of ELT Conference Logos.

The Good

TESOL International, Philadelphia 2012

 

Philly

Now this is actually excellent. Right as it says there on the tin. You have a conference theme that actually connects somehow to the host city in a positive way, and a nice graphic of some people, well, they’re just walking to a conference. In order to, I presume, do something or talk about something positive and excellent about their work. Well done, Philly. Well done.

 

Cambodia TESOL 2014camtesol logoI like this a lot. It doesn’t try and be anything other than what it is. Which is a conference about English Language Teaching. In Cambodia. Thanks, Cambodia. Others, take note.

 

The Bad

 

JALT 2006, Kitakyushu

jalt2006

Now I went to this conference and I quite enjoyed it. But I can’t put my hand on my heart and say it had an effect whatsoever on my ‘identity’ or especially motivated me. I mean, presumably most people who were there kind of like their jobs and don’t need to schlep it all the way to Kitakyushu to feel motivated. I guess it kind of helped with community in that I bonded with a bunch of people over six pints of Guinness in an Irish bar on the conference Saturday, but really. Come on.

 

KOTESOL International Conference, 2015, Seoul

kotesolic2015

Man, it’s all in there on this one. Wacky geometrical logo: Check. Colors straight from a child’s candy stash: Check. Disconnected, disjointed sloganeering veering off in all sorts of actual and conceptual directions: Check. Confused and somewhat dazed look on my face as I try and figure all that out: Check.

 

TESOL 2015, TorontoTESOL torontoOK. So what do we have here…. “Crossing borders”, huh? So…. Where are we going with this? Some place off to the right on a blue arrow that looks a bit like a Picasso Dolphin? ….so what next. “Building Bridges”. Let’s see, back across the border on the purple arrow thingy and sort of point back at the “Crossing Borders” thing? Why? This would be really confusing, but thank God you have those green and pink square joblets in the background to help you make some sense out of it.

 

 

Eurocall 2012, Gothenburg

eurocall

“Using, Learning, Knowing. Using, Learning, Knowing. Using, Learning, Knowing. Using, Learning, Knowing. You are feeling very sleepy. Using, Learning, Knowing. Come into my cold, deathly embrace”

 

The Ugly

 

JALT PanSIG Conference 2015, Kobe

pansig

Oh boy. Where do I start with this one? It certainly raises something within me, but I can tell you for free it’s not ‘happiness’. It’s somewhere between ‘bewilderment’, and ‘outright confusion’ as to what possible narrative could come from this to lead to any semblance of tangible clarity around what this weekend was all about? This is straight from the happy-clappy-for-the-sake-of-it farm, isn’t it?

 

IATEFL BESIG Conference 2013, Budapest

BESIG

Please folks, can someone who went to this tell me what exactly was going on here? Or are the attendees of this 2013 junket still trying to find their way home from Budapest?

 

MEXTESOL 2008, Guanajuato

Mextesol

So you’ve got a bronze statue dude, who is sort of inside a church or a cathedral, with another church inside. But it’s also outside And he has a hammer and he’s fixing a bronze shoe. And it’s all going on in a way in which just positively screams “New Ways for New Needs in ELT”

 

JALT Pan-SIG 2013, Nagoya

jigsawjalt

Is there something in the water in Japan? Yet again you have the assorted fruit flavors running all around your eyes, and this time they have a JIGSAW! Yeah! A freaking jigsaw people. But no buzzwords this time. Maybe they just kind of gave up.

Advertisements

26 comments

  1. David Harbinson

    Interesting observations. Now correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t KoTESOL run a competition for this year’s poster asking members to come up with the design. I wonder whether this was a member-submitted design or not. Either way, I agree that the weird geometric design seemed a little weird when I first saw it–it doesn’t even look quite right.

    • robertjdickey

      they did. None of the proposals met the expectations, which included addressing the theme, print-quality production, etc. A Professional did this, as is the case at most conferences. See my reply below for more on imagery.

  2. robertjdickey

    using a new login option here…

    I value that Mike opens his platform to contributions from others, both in posts (less common) and responses (more common, not common enough).

    Graphics are H-A-R-D. they should be based in some part on the theme (more to follow). They should capture imagination, inform (picture worth thousand words, yadayadayada), be clear and uncluttered… Big corporations spend millions and still don’t get it right. Let’s be kind on the volunteer-based nonprofits.

    Themes – I’ll tend to agree. Most are rather meaningless, even when the conference organizers have their hearts in the right place(s?). (English is hard too!)

    Two things to consider here as I, a sometimes conference organizer, defend the flag (I mean, the themes).

    I. Buzzwords are buzzwords,
    but such popularity probably means there is a deeper meaning that more than a few think is important. I often say that ELT is a field where they teach vocabulary but can’t agree on professional terminology. (ponder that) And too often, ELTers try to load their own social consciousness as ELT “oughta-dos,” which is utter tripe. Still, some terms ARE meaningful.
    — TESOL Crossing Borders — was the first TESOL International Convention to be hosted outside of USA (crossing the border to Canada, making TESOL truly “international”?). We can scoff at the (in)significance, but it was a purposeful message. When one reads the conference theme explanation (does anyone bother? See next point, Roman Numeral II), we see that the “bridges” element was aimed at reducing isolationism between teachers and fields of interest. (purposefully avoiding “communities of practice” here!)
    — KOTESOL 2015 “Learning through Inquiry” (the subtitle) is in fact the main focus of the conference, hopefully. Unfortunately, in the past 20 years, only one KOTESOL International Conference has managed to avoid the prototypical Colonated conference theme. “ABC to EFG : XYZ.” Only KOTESOL 2008 — Responding to a Changing World — avoided the colon, but I doubt our author appreciates it any the more.

    II. Themes affect,
    sometimes more, sometimes less. They often guide (at least partially) selection of some major speakers, and help shape (at least partially) what many major speakers talk about. They have far less impact on the concurrent sessions, even when “addressing the theme” is part of the proposal evaluation process. Look, not everyone wants all their conference sessions to be about the theme. But some presenters do make conference selections, and not a few attendees traveling outside the hometown, make choices, based on the theme and probably major focus of a conference.

    • mikecorea

      Just to say, thank you for the thoughtful and insightful comments here, Rob. Very interesing (a few people messaged me privately and said just that)

      Funny thing (well to me anyway) is that as I was writing the short intro part I almost included something like “please don’t use the word volunteer” in any comments. Why? Because I thought it would be an easy way to explain away choices and logos and such. I see where you are coming from but I also wonder if that idea makes it too easy to pawn off not very professional things at times. Anyway, thanks again for the comments!

      • robertjdickey

        yeah, the whole concept of “volunteer” can be an excuse for nonprofessionalism. AGREED!
        But then, “what’s a professional” is a major issue in TESOL (and elsewhere). That’s a blogpost in itself. Some folks/fields use semi-professional and paraprofessional in their industry/profession…
        But my argument about ugly logos from megacorps spending millions on identity make-overs still stands. In the end, most folks don’t care anyways???
        I enjoyed the post, by the way!~

  3. Clare

    This was an amusing article! It made me laugh outloud! I know the topic can be taken more seriously, and appreciate the points made in comments above. But I just wanted to say thanks for making me smile!

  4. Tyson Seburn (@seburnt)

    Hahaha. Good call. Sometimes it’s hard to believe associations can possibly think they’re good. Websites are even worse. So much of our profession represents us like we’re a backyard business designed by elementary school students.

  5. Steve King

    Thanks all, for the comments, especially Robert’s. This is, of course, little more than a lighthearted look at something that mildly amuses me. I understand and appreciate all the hard work that goes into organizing conferences.

  6. Ben Naismith

    Very funny. The CAMTESOL was definitely my favourite but I kind of also dug the weird Budapest squiggles.

    I presented at a TESOL Arabia conference one year when the theme was ‘From KG to College to Career’ – I took it to mean that they were happy with any presentation as long as it wasn’t about teaching very young learners or English for senior citizens. Discriminatory I say!

  7. Steve King

    I very nearly included the KG to Career one. There were quite a few more I could have included, in either the Good, Bad or Ugly categories

  8. gotanda

    Themes. I hate the damn themes. Once working on a conference we had a short list of about a dozen themes. Nobody had Googled them, and it turned out every one of the buzzword-laden bunch had been used in the past year. I really wish we could just get rid of the themes completely. But, I will likely be complicit in at least one or two more very soon.

    I think maybe that there is an Online Conference Theme Buzzword Generator out there somewhere that organizers have been using

    Yep. There is. And I’ve even tried it once in a while…
    “Research in Ancient Cosmology: The Rise of the Machines #riac15”
    “Visualization of Postmodern Doomsday Preppers: A poststructuralist perspective #vopdp15”
    It used to be semi-reasonable until people started playing with it too much. You can add more phrases to the pool if you like.

    That Narratives logo. Textbook. I knew it was going to be on there. Just pleased to see that none of the logos that I’ve helped gestate made the list.

  9. stafford1

    Ok, so I guess it is time to own up…. I was the one who came up with the original design for the 2015 KOTESOL international conference. I say “original design” since it was a rough “sketch” on a Powerpoint slide, if I recall.

    I was somewhat surprised when it started popping up about the place and eventually became the poster (and I guess the program cover?).

    Without disavowing all responsibility, it has changed considerably from the original concept which was absent the “candy colours” (more of a pastels man myself) and wasn’t amidst a field of text and sloganeering.

    My personal beef is the gradient background, nothing wrong with a stark white if you ask me.

    Rob brings up the point of volunteers and time and such, but this was definitely a 10 minute thing theown together, I never expected it to go this far!

    Personally the JALT PanSIG one is the best. Has the makings of a great t-shirt, hell maybe even a tattoo!

  10. Pingback: ELT Conference Logos: The Good, the Bad, and th...

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s